At the end of 16 August 1947
Chiefly and jagir jurisdictions within the former agency system. The polygon should not be assigned one presumed ruler or one instrument. [1][2][3][4]
Ruler, negotiators and other participants
The ruler or governing authority recorded for the snapshot is: Thara’s thakurs and jagir holders; the 1961 Census describes the area as Thara Jagirs. Individual 1947 holders have not been established. [1][2][3][4]
National framework: Vallabhbhai Patel headed the States Department; V. P. Menon was its secretary; Mountbatten assisted accession negotiations. This does not establish that all three personally negotiated this territory’s settlement. [5][6]
How the relationship changed
The Gujarat states and smaller jurisdictions were integrated with Bombay. The White Paper records 144 units in this regional settlement; the regional effective date is not an individual instrument’s signature date. [1][2][3][4]
The documented sequence distinguishes these events: 10 June 1948 — gujarat states integrated with Bombay. [1][2][3][4]
SHARED HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Gujarat: unravelling an interlaced administrative map
The Gujarat settlement concerned more than a list of equivalent sovereign states. It included states, estates, talukas, thanas and jurisdictions with several shareholders. Their territories were interspersed with Baroda and with Bombay’s Ahmedabad and Kaira districts. The White Paper argued that this geography made a separate union of the small Gujarat jurisdictions impractical. [1]
After discussions in Bombay, the jurisdictional rulers agreed on 17 March 1948 to merger with the province. Bombay took over administration on 10 June. The official total of 144 units, or a larger number when shareholders were counted separately, describes that regional settlement. It is not the number of individually verified states on this map, and 10 June is an administrative transfer date rather than proof of the day each ruler signed. [1]
Merger replaced a patchwork of governing authorities with provincial administration. Danta was taken over separately in November 1948; Baroda itself did not merge until May 1949. Grouped and ambiguously named features need particular care, since a source polygon may combine jurisdictions whose histories differ. Where the individual instrument or ruler has not been identified, the regional account supplies context without filling those gaps with a fictional common accession. [1][7]
What this mapped feature does—and does not—identify
The historical account and the identification of a polygon are separate pieces of evidence. A documented merger in a nearby state does not prove that an unnamed or ambiguous outline represents that state. Candidate identities on this page remain conditional. Where no event is securely assigned to this feature, the timeline stays empty rather than borrowing a candidate’s dates. [1][2][3][4]
The collective accession account is not an individual signed instrument. No exact signature or acceptance date is inferred. [1][2][3][4]
The source map may combine a state with thana jurisdictions or shared estates. Individual boundaries and signatories need reconciliation. [1][2][3][4]
The integration route is documented, but the 1947 incumbent has not been independently established. [1][2][3][4]
The timeline
Dates identify the event recorded. A month or year is left imprecise where the evidence does not supply a day.
- AFTER THE SNAPSHOT
Gujarat states integrated with Bombay
Timeline evidence: [1] 1950 White Paper: Gujarat States[2] Sabar Kantha small states and shared jurisdictions[3] 1961 Census: Bombay territorial changes, 1941–51[4] 1961 Banaskantha Census Handbook: administrative history
Evidence & map notes
Snapshot basis. The evidence does not establish a uniform, completed accession to India for this feature on 16 August 1947.
The collective accession account is not an individual signed instrument. No exact signature or acceptance date is inferred.
The source map may combine a state with thana jurisdictions or shared estates. Individual boundaries and signatories need reconciliation.
The integration route is documented, but the 1947 incumbent has not been independently established.
Boundary source: 1941. Source-year boundary (1941); the 16 August 1947 boundary has not been independently verified. This reference is not a verified reconstruction of the boundary on 16 August 1947.
Paragraph citations distinguish published agreements, contemporary accounts, later chronologies and historical scholarship. Regional chapters explain a shared process; they do not establish a separate local negotiation or exact instrument date where none has been verified.
Sources & further reading
The White Paper records the Indian government’s account and reproduced legal instruments. It is not an independent assessment of every claim of consent, coercion or popular opinion.
- 1950 White Paper: Gujarat States ↗Government account / primary document transcription
- Sabar Kantha small states and shared jurisdictions ↗Secondary chronology
- 1961 Census: Bombay territorial changes, 1941–51 ↗Primary / official source
- 1961 Banaskantha Census Handbook: administrative history ↗Primary / official source
- 1950 White Paper: States Department ↗Government account / primary document transcription
- 1950 White Paper: Special Meeting of Princes on 25th July, 1947 ↗Government account / primary document transcription
- 1950 White Paper: Baroda ↗Government account / primary document transcription
- 1950 White Paper: Successful Conclusion of Negotiations ↗Government account / primary document transcription
- 1950 White Paper: Instrument of Accession ↗Government account / primary document transcription