2,289 extracted source records. 146 mapped histories.
Browse named entries from historical surveys, archaeological registers and official damage assessments. These are source records, not a count of unique destroyed temples. Several entries may concern the same place; one entry may describe a group. Each preserves its source and the work still needed.
Interactive search could not load. You can still browse the pages and download the catalogue.
Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Arzani
Patna · Patna District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Patna District; Patna; extracted line 1070
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-568e19dc7431 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Ata
Gangarampur · Malda District · BENGAL
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BENGAL; Malda District; Gangarampur; extracted line 836
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-b350de195446 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Babu Haji Samad
Kalpi · Jalaun District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Jalaun District; Kalpi; extracted line 4353
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-34516ede5a8d Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Daud
Hyderabad · Hyderabad District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Hyderabad District; Hyderabad; extracted line 467
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-aaf619a9de12 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Dawal
Uprai · Akola District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Akola District; Uprai; extracted line 2817
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-079569b911a0 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Fakbru’d-Din
Penukonda · Anantpur District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Anantpur District; Penukonda; extracted line 383
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-d0b59c6939fc Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Fazlu’llah GosaiN
Biharsharif · Nalanda District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Nalanda District; Biharsharif; extracted line 1020
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-035bccaffbae Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Haidri
Nizampatnam · Guntur District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Guntur District; Nizampatnam; extracted line 436
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-5076f5dfcde9 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Hazrat Ali
Shahganj · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Shahganj; extracted line 4395
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-b801c36b7e6c Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Jumman Madariyya
Hilsa · Patna District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Patna District; Hilsa; extracted line 1043
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-4ecb07d72bdc Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Khalifatu’r-Rahman Qadiri (d
Firozabad · Gulbarga District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Gulbarga District; Firozabad; extracted line 2129
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-4bb8a1e680a0 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Latif
Nalgonda · Nalgonda District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Nalgonda District; Nalgonda; extracted line 608
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-9dbac6f89568 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Madar
Narwar · Shivpuri District · MADHYA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MADHYA PRADESH; Shivpuri District; Narwar; extracted line 2646
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-c23d18d8b818 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Madni
Vishakhapatnam · Vishakhapatnam District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Vishakhapatnam District; Vishakhapatnam; extracted line 671
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-e83d179c4c41 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Majlis
Kalna · Burdwan District · BENGAL
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BENGAL; Burdwan District; Kalna; extracted line 732
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-36aeb2e4fa06 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Mir Mansur
Patna · Patna District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Patna District; Patna; extracted line 1068
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-e80ad6a49f47 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Miranji Shamsu’l-Haq Chishti on Shahpur Hill
Bijapur · Bijapur District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bijapur District; Bijapur; extracted line 2038
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-122e8569e5c2 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Muhammad Pir on Lakshmana Tila renamed Pir Muhammad Hill
Lucknow · Lucknow District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Lucknow District; Lucknow; extracted line 4445
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-61ce6c8ef63c Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Musa Qadiri
Hyderabad · Hyderabad District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Hyderabad District; Hyderabad; extracted line 451
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-18878ba6aab7 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Musa Qadiri
Bijapur · Bijapur District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bijapur District; Bijapur; extracted line 2020
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-27ba67fcbf5f Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Nafa Chishti
Monghyr · Monghyr District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Monghyr District; Monghyr; extracted line 1002
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-5859cdbe6ff2 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Nizam Bukhari
Chhoti Khatu · Nagaur District · RAJASTHAN
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
RAJASTHAN; Nagaur District; Chhoti Khatu; extracted line 3392
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-1f794d0c4384 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Nizamu’d-Din
Kaghzipura · Aurangabad District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Aurangabad District; Kaghzipura; extracted line 2864
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-c655506d791b Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Pashminaposh
Phulwarisharif · Patna District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Patna District; Phulwarisharif; extracted line 1090
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-f63992be33c8 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Qumais
Biharsharif · Nalanda District · BIHAR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BIHAR; Nalanda District; Biharsharif; extracted line 1030
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-87714ec93aef Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Qumais
Sadhaura · Ambala District · HARYANA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
HARYANA; Ambala District; Sadhaura; extracted line 1694
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-edbd813b8744 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Ruknu’d-Din or Shah Nachchan
Sakrauda · Saharanpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Saharanpur District; Sakrauda; extracted line 4635
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-ee82de0ddc12 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Shamsu’d-Din Muhammad Qadiri known as Multani Padshah
Bidar · Bidar District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bidar District; Bidar; extracted line 1942
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-fa1788957182 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Turkman
Shahjahanabad · Shahjahanabad · DELHI
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
DELHI; Shahjahanabad; ; extracted line 1243
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-330e368721ee Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Wali
Dargah · Hyderabad District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Hyderabad District; Dargah; extracted line 442
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-c8ee0140b8c7 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Waliu’llah-al-Husaini
Bidar · Bidar District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bidar District; Bidar; extracted line 1944
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-1bb022cea567 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Wilayat
Manglaur · Saharanpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Saharanpur District; Manglaur; extracted line 4631
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-07713af00568 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Wilayat
Badaun · Badaun District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Badaun District; Badaun; extracted line 4081
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-3ec342fc079e Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Zainu’l-Din Ganj Nishin
Bidar · Bidar District · KARNATAKA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KARNATAKA; Bidar District; Bidar; extracted line 1946
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-2e16bde2d433 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shah Ziau’d-Din Muhammad
Gohana · Sonepat District · HARYANA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
HARYANA; Sonepat District; Gohana; extracted line 1859
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-05a44808b96e Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Sharifu’d-Din
Devarkonda · Nalgonda District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Nalgonda District; Devarkonda; extracted line 599
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-87d879dec1e3 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shukru’d-DIn on the western shore
Wular Lake · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Wular Lake; extracted line 2376
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-5af3032e9fdb Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shykh Abdul Qadir Jilani
Nagaur · Nagaur District · RAJASTHAN
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
RAJASTHAN; Nagaur District; Nagaur; extracted line 3508
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-21862c68bd9c Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shykh Alau’d-Din Ali bin Ahmad Sabri, a disciple of Baba Farid Shakar Ganj of Pak Pattan
Kaliyar · Saharanpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Saharanpur District; Kaliyar; extracted line 4626
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-1f37d7128874 Earlier-site claim — unverifiedDargah of Shykh Ibrahim known as Makhdumji
Patancheru · Medak District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Medak District; Patancheru; extracted line 587
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-366efbb51bf4 The full source bodies remain in the research cache. This public catalogue contains an index of factual fields and source locators. It is incomplete, and the source families have different coverage and evidentiary limits.