BROKEN TEMPLESTHE SUBCONTINENT ATLAS
← Back to the map

BEYOND THE MAPPED DOSSIERS

A larger record.
Open to examination.

2,289 extracted source records. 146 mapped histories.

Search the catalogue ↓

Browse named entries from historical surveys, archaeological registers and official damage assessments. These are source records, not a count of unique destroyed temples. Several entries may concern the same place; one entry may describe a group. Each preserves its source and the work still needed.

How to read this catalogue

Official assessments describe reported physical damage. Archaeological remains often have no known loss date or destroyer. Historical compilations include claims about later buildings and reused material; those claims await independent checks. Dates on later monuments are not treated as temple destruction dates. Earthquake losses remain separate from intentional acts.

Download JSON ↗ · Download CSV ↗ · Article bibliographies & research queue ↗

2,289 source records · page 54 of 58

Material-reuse claim — unverified

Syyidpara Masjid

Bayana · Bharatpur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Bharatpur District; Bayana; extracted line 3244

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-ecd436936fb5
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Takht-i-Sulaiman Masjid

Alamgir Hill · Cuttack District · ORISSA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ORISSA; Cuttack District; Alamgir Hill; extracted line 3124

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-631458310149
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Tanka or Jami Masjid

Dholka · Ahmadabad District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Ahmadabad District; Dholka; extracted line 1335

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-7f7d65cb5177
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Temple materials have been used in the walls and buildings of the Garden of Fidai Khan

Pinjor · Ambala District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Ambala District; Pinjor; extracted line 1683

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b8a33e85da5f
Material-reuse claim — unverified

The Jains who predominated in this town were expelled by Muslims and all temples of the former were

Rander · Surat District · GUJARAT

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

GUJARAT; Surat District; Rander; extracted line 1649

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-6767679a9f43
Material-reuse claim — unverified

This city was built by Firuz Shah Tughlaq with

Hissar · Hissar District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Hissar District; Hissar; extracted line 1761

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b91ae6c24043
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Toli Masjid

Hyderabad · Hyderabad District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Hyderabad District; Hyderabad; extracted line 455

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-1be998ddf31f
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Tomb of Bibi Pari

Dacca · Dacca District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Dacca District; Dacca; extracted line 756

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-262f8e6362bd
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Tomb of Sadatu’llah Khan

Arcot · North Arcot District · TAMIL NADU

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

TAMIL NADU; North Arcot District; Arcot; extracted line 3654

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-595ec001f789
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Tripolia Darwaza

Naraina · Jaipur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Jaipur District; Naraina; extracted line 3284

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-28835ce5868d
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Two Maqbaras

Rath · Hamirpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Hamirpur District; Rath; extracted line 4320

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-0d7dde42f239
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Two Maqbaras

Mahoba · Hamirpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Hamirpur District; Mahoba; extracted line 4314

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-cabeda9bbc74
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Two Masjids built in the reign of Jahangir

Sadhaura · Ambala District · HARYANA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

HARYANA; Ambala District; Sadhaura; extracted line 1688

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-5f3444a876cb
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Zafar Khan-ki-Masjid

Tribeni · Hooghly District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Hooghly District; Tribeni; extracted line 812

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-a9f73c63c210
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat

Sangar · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Sangar; extracted line 2317

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-247fb32780f4
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat

Loduv · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Loduv; extracted line 2306

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-c539b075c584
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat near Dampor

Theda · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Theda; extracted line 2370

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-c97b8ce1fefc
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat of Baba Imam Din Rishi

Gulmarg · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Gulmarg; extracted line 2301

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-d49f9457728c
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat of Farrukhzad Sahib

Amburher · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Amburher; extracted line 2285

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-621cc5d67bfc
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat of Jyesther and other monuments

Gupkar · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Gupkar; extracted line 2302

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-23f9c5ea2261
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat of Khwaja Khizr

Sar · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Sar; extracted line 2318

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-e7b663933ffc
Material-reuse claim — unverified

Ziarat of Mir Muhammad Hamadani

Pampor · KASHMIR

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KASHMIR; ; Pampor; extracted line 2312

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-2eaa3bbd7606
Conversion claim — unverified

Alai Masjid

Mandalgarh · Udaipur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Udaipur District; Mandalgarh; extracted line 3586

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-7783972be6b3
Conversion claim — unverified

Ãlamgiri or VijaimaNDal Masjid

Vidisha · Vidisha District · MADHYA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MADHYA PRADESH; Vidisha District; Vidisha; extracted line 2734

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-863df60dd96e
Conversion claim — unverified

Anbiya Wali Masjid and several others in Nagar

Fatehpur Sikri · Agra District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Agra District; Fatehpur Sikri; extracted line 4005

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-8741d0941e06
Conversion claim — unverified

Assi Khamba Masjid

Mahaban · Mathura District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Mathura District; Mahaban; extracted line 4469

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-2f260f77b0fe
Conversion claim — unverified

Bajra Masjid

Begamganj · Noakhali District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Noakhali District; Begamganj; extracted line 928

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-b8a51486a4a3
Conversion claim — unverified

Bhartari Mazar

Tijara · Alwar District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Alwar District; Tijara; extracted line 3223

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-3249d02800b9
Conversion claim — unverified

Bindu Madhava Masjid

Varanasi · Varanasi District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Varanasi District; Varanasi; extracted line 4696

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-08d939a74f3c
Conversion claim — unverified

Capital of the Later Chalukyas

Kalyani · Bidar District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Bidar District; Kalyani; extracted line 1962

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-e3653b003a39
Conversion claim — unverified

Chaurasi Khamba Masjid

Kaman · Bharatpur District · RAJASTHAN

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

RAJASTHAN; Bharatpur District; Kaman; extracted line 3261

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-31904688a743
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Babayya

Penukonda · Anantpur District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Anantpur District; Penukonda; extracted line 379

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-e14f65fffbe8
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Badr Makhdum

Chatgaon District · Chatgaon District · BENGAL

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

BENGAL; Chatgaon District; ; extracted line 750

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-167bc7eedb60
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Dastgir Swami

Jangalapalle · Cuddapah District · ANDHRA PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

ANDHRA PRADESH; Cuddapah District; Jangalapalle; extracted line 411

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-39bcf83f1c8e
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Mabsu Sahib

Latur · Parbhani District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Parbhani District; Latur; extracted line 3017

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-ca20b5d6826e
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of NatThar Shah Wali

Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3909

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-0cbba435d814
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Pir Kadu Sahib

Daulatabad · Aurangabad District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Aurangabad District; Daulatabad; extracted line 2859

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-ec6aa01807d0
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Pir Muhammad Shah

Mahoba · Hamirpur District · UTTAR PRADESH

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

UTTAR PRADESH; Hamirpur District; Mahoba; extracted line 4316

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-70673b84986f
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Qasim Sahib

Hoskot · Bangalore District · KARNATAKA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

KARNATAKA; Bangalore District; Hoskot; extracted line 1883

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-de05b7822f5c
Conversion claim — unverified

Dargah of Sayyid Qadiri

Latur · Parbhani District · MAHARASHTRA

Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗

Source & scope

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗

MAHARASHTRA; Parbhani District; Latur; extracted line 3019

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Record: goel-survey-595f83ff5d5a

Inventories consulted

The full source bodies remain in the research cache. This public catalogue contains an index of factual fields and source locators. It is incomplete, and the source families have different coverage and evidentiary limits.

Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 · 1,870 records

Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Historical compilation

Captured reference trail

These entries are listed in this inventory. Their original editions are not all assessed.

  1. History of Aurangzeb, Calcutta, 1925-52. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  2. Religious Policy of the Mughal Emperors, Bombay, 1962. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  3. Archaeological Survey of India, Annual Report 1925-26. Pp. 129-30. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  4. Ibid., p. 129. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  5. Ibid., p. l28. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  6. Ibid., 1907-08, p. 113. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  7. Ibid., Pp. 114. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  8. Ibid., p. 114-15. Technical details have been omitted and emphasis added. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  9. Ibid., p. 116. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  10. Ibid., p. 120. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  11. Ibid., p. 126. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  12. Ibid., p. 61. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  13. Ibid., 1907-08, Pp. 47, to 72. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  14. Ibid., 1903-04, p. 86. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  15. Ibid., 1902-3, p. 52. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  16. Ibid., 1921-22, p. 83. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  17. Ibid., p. 84. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  18. Ibid., 1902-03, p. 56. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  19. Ibid., 1933-34, Pp. 36-37. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  20. Ibid., 1902-03, Pp. 16-17. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  21. Ibid., 1993-4, Pp. 31-32. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  22. Ibid., 1902-03, Pp. 17-18. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  23. Ibid., 1903-04, p. 43. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  24. Ibid., p. 63. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  25. Ibid., 1904-05, p. 24. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  26. Ibid., 1929-30, p. 29. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  27. Ibid., 1928-29, Pp. 167-68. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  28. Robert Sewell, A Forgotten Empire, New Delhi Reprint, 1962, Pp. 199-200. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  29. Archaeological Survey of India, Volume I : Four Reports Made During the Years 1862-63-64-65, Varanasi Reprint, 1972, Pp. 440-41. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  30. Ratan Pribhdas Hingorani, Sites Index to A.S.I. Circle Reports New Delhi 1978, Pp. 17-262. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  31. S.A.A. Rizvi, History of Sufism in India, Volume 1, New Delhi, 1978, P. 189. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  32. Ghulam Abdul Qadir Nazir, Bahr-i-Azam or Travels of Azam Shah Nawwab Walajah, 1823, Madras, 1960, p. 128. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  33. Ibid., p. 64. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
  34. Ibid., p. 128. · Listed by Goel; underlying edition not yet assessed
Archaeological Survey of India: centrally protected monuments register · 141 records

Only sacred-site rows explicitly describing ruins, remains, missing fabric or damage are selected. Protection alone is not evidence of destruction. This register generally does not date losses or identify a responsible actor. Historic administrative labels are preserved.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Archaeological inventory
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 · 156 records

Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Official damage assessment
Richard M. Eaton: Instances of Temple Desecration, Frontline, 22 December 2000 · 80 records

Eighty selected episodes, not eighty unique temples and not a total for all history. Several rows identify towns or regions rather than named buildings. Attribution is Eaton’s; underlying numbered works are a separate follow-up task. Source-era geographic labels and disputed dates are retained. PDF text extraction was corrected using the original table layout.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Historical scholarship

Captured reference trail

These entries are listed in this inventory. Their original editions are not all assessed.

  1. Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  2. Epigraphia Indica, Arabic & Persian Supplement · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  3. Annual Report of Indian Epigraphy · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  4. Indian Antiquary · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  5. Jahangir, Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri, tr. A. Rogers, (Delhi, 1968), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  6. Firishta, Tarikh-i Firishta tr. J. Briggs, History of the Rise of the Mahomedan Power in India (Calcutta, 1971), 4 vols. · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  7. Kanbo, `Amal-i Salih (text: Lahore, 1967), v. 2 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  8. A. Butterworth and V.V. Chetty. A Collection of the Inscriptions on Copper- Plates & Stones in the Nellore District (Madras, 1905), v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  9. Khafi Khan, Khafi Khan’s History of `Alamgir, tr. S.M. Haq (Karachi, 1975) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  10. A. Cunningham, Four Reports Made during 1862-65 (Varanasi, 1972) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  11. S.N. Sinha, Subah of Allahabad under the Great Mughals (New Delhi, 1974) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  12. Saqi Must`ad Khan, Maasir-i `Alamgiri, tr. J. Sarkar (Calcutta, 1947) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  13. Saqi Must`ad Khan, Maasir-i `Alamgiri (text: Calcutta, 1871) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  14. Nizamuddin Ahmad, Tabaqat-i Akbari, tr. B. De (Calcutta, 1973), 3 vols. · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  15. Ishwardas Nagar, Futuhat-i `Alamgiri, tr. T. Ahmad (Delhi, 1978) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  16. Surendranath Sen, ed. & tr., Siva Chhatrapati (Calcutta, 1920), v.1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  17. P. Sreenivasachar, ed., Corpus of Inscriptions in the Telingana Districts of H.E.M. the Nizam’s Dominions, pt. 2 (Hyderabad, 1940) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  18. Shah Nawaz Khan, Maathir-ul-Umara, tr. H. Beveridge (Patna, 1979), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  19. Z.A. Desai, Published Muslim Inscriptions of Rajasthan (Jaipur, 1971) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  20. G. Roerich, tr., Biography of Dharmaswamin (Patna, 1959) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  21. Minhaj-i Siraj, Tabakat-i Nasiri, tr. H. Raverty (New Delhi, 1970), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  22. Chattopadhyaya, D., ed., Taranatha’s History of Buddhism in India (Calcutta, 1980) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  23. Hasan Nizami, Taj al-ma`athir, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 2 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  24. Amir Khusrau, Miftah al-futuh, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  25. Amir Khusrau, Khaza’in al-futuh, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  26. Shams-i Siraj, Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  27. Zia al-Din Barani, Tarikh-i Firuz Shahi, Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 3 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  28. Khwajah Ni`mat Allah, Tarikh-i Khan-Jahani wa makhzan-i-Afghani (text: Dacca, 1960), v. 1 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  29. Sikandar bin Muhammad, Mirat-i Sikandari, in E.C. Bayley, Local Muhammadan Dynasties: Gujarat, ed. N Singh (repr. New Delhi, 1970) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  30. Azad al-Husaini, Nau-Bahar-i Murshid Quli Khani, tr., Jadu Nath Sarkar, Bengal Nawabs (1952, repr. Calcutta, 1985) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  31. Abd al-Hamid Lahori, Badshah-nama, in Elliot & Dowson, History, v. 7 · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  32. South Indian Inscriptions (New Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  33. George Michell, “City as Cosmogram,” South Asian Studies 8 (1992) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  34. Jonaraja, Rajatarangini, ed. S.L. Sadhu, trans. J.C. Dutt (repr. New Delhi, 1993) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  35. Iqtidar Husain Siddiqui, tr., Waqi`at-e-Mushtaqui of Shaikh Rizq Ullah Mushtaqui (New Delhi, 1993) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
  36. Jagadish Narayan Sarkar, Life of Mir Jumla (Calcutta, 1952) · Listed by Eaton; underlying edition not yet assessed
Bangladesh 1989 incident report: translation reproduced in Goel, volume I appendix · 42 records

Translation attributed to the Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council. The translated report was read; its original Bengali edition and independent corroboration remain unexamined. Named shrines are leads, not adjudicated events. Source-era district names and uncertain localities are preserved. Unnamed regional totals are not multiplied into temples.

Read original inventory ↗

Accessed 2026-09-28 · Reported incidents / translated compilation