2,289 extracted source records. 146 mapped histories.
Browse named entries from historical surveys, archaeological registers and official damage assessments. These are source records, not a count of unique destroyed temples. Several entries may concern the same place; one entry may describe a group. Each preserves its source and the work still needed.
Interactive search could not load. You can still browse the pages and download the catalogue.
Conversion claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Bheka
Tiruchirapalli · Tiruchirapalli District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; Tiruchirapalli District; Tiruchirapalli; extracted line 3943
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-5bd2bd36533b Conversion claim — unverifiedMazar of Shah Madar
Makanpur · Kanpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Kanpur District; Makanpur; extracted line 4434
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-6b2f2693b85e Conversion claim — unverifiedMazar of Shykh Farid
Girad · Wardha District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Wardha District; Girad; extracted line 3113
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-b7e4eb6a7f7e Conversion claim — unverifiedMochI Masjid
Ujjain · Ujjain District · MADHYA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MADHYA PRADESH; Ujjain District; Ujjain; extracted line 2679
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-c4aa16bcc1ad Conversion claim — unverifiedNamazgah near the Talav
Parenda · Osmanabad District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Osmanabad District; Parenda; extracted line 3010
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-c8fd049107cd Conversion claim — unverifiedNaulakh Gumbad
Kare · North Arcot District · TAMIL NADU
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
TAMIL NADU; North Arcot District; Kare; extracted line 3732
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-c322a79e9b55 Conversion claim — unverifiedPir Sahib-ki-Masjid
Jangalvilas · Howrah District · BENGAL
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BENGAL; Howrah District; Jangalvilas; extracted line 820
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-9dd1a00e7614 Conversion claim — unverifiedQadam Sharif of Ãdam
Kondavidu · Krishna District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; Krishna District; Kondavidu; extracted line 509
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-91037e13ee78 Conversion claim — unverifiedQadimi Masjid
Paunar · Wardha District · MAHARASHTRA
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
MAHARASHTRA; Wardha District; Paunar; extracted line 3114
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-1c905240deb1 Conversion claim — unverifiedSaif Khan-ki-Masjid
Dacca · Dacca District · BENGAL
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
BENGAL; Dacca District; Dacca; extracted line 758
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-ef35de02316f Conversion claim — unverifiedSawai Masjid
Eluru · West Godavari District · ANDHRA PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
ANDHRA PRADESH; West Godavari District; Eluru; extracted line 683
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-d15bb4c608ac Conversion claim — unverifiedShah Jahani Masjid at Surajpole
Nagaur · Nagaur District · RAJASTHAN
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
RAJASTHAN; Nagaur District; Nagaur; extracted line 3534
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-d79e3e6bc522 Conversion claim — unverifiedTaleti Masjid in the Bijayagarh Fort
Bayana · Bharatpur District · RAJASTHAN
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
RAJASTHAN; Bharatpur District; Bayana; extracted line 3252
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-08ebe4efbfd6 Conversion claim — unverifiedTwo Dargahs
Saidpur · Ghazipur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Ghazipur District; Saidpur; extracted line 4286
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-b3d39c8d8aaa Conversion claim — unverifiedÛkha or Nohara Masjid
Bayana · Bharatpur District · RAJASTHAN
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
RAJASTHAN; Bharatpur District; Bayana; extracted line 3238
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-9790a564d086 Conversion claim — unverifiedZafar Khan-ki-Masjid
Zafarabad · Jaunpur District · UTTAR PRADESH
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
UTTAR PRADESH; Jaunpur District; Zafarabad; extracted line 4402
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-7ee7718bb147 Conversion claim — unverifiedZiarat farther up the valley
Bumzu · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Bumzu; extracted line 2299
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-c35f52a37a33 Conversion claim — unverifiedZiarat named Nur Pirastan
Srinagar · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Srinagar; extracted line 2342
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-b88a2b9b7e74 Conversion claim — unverifiedZiarat of Baba Bamdin
Bumzu · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Bumzu; extracted line 2295
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-0e636c69d759 Conversion claim — unverifiedZiarat of Bahau’d-Din SAhib
Srinagar · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Srinagar; extracted line 2322
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-acd31cc1cafd Conversion claim — unverifiedZiarat of Pir Haji Muhammad Sahib, south-west of the Jami Masjid
Srinagar · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Srinagar; extracted line 2348
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-abeb280d2423 Conversion claim — unverifiedZiarat of Ruknu’d-Din Rishi
Bumzu · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Bumzu; extracted line 2297
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-bb5b42772186 Conversion claim — unverifiedZiarats of Makhdum Sahib and Akhun Mulla on Hari Parbat
Srinagar · KASHMIR
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Sita Ram Goel: regional survey, volume I, chapter 10 ↗
KASHMIR; ; Srinagar; extracted line 2350
Advocacy compilation. Entries concern alleged earlier sacred sites, conversion or reused material, often identified by a later monument. The original temple, loss date and responsibility may be unspecified. Dates beside later monuments must not be read as temple destruction dates. Claims require independent verification; group entries are not expanded into invented temples.
Record: goel-survey-35b1c312152a Context / identity checkAgam Ghar
West of Bagmati · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 108
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-1deab06d0f3c Context / identity checkAgamchhe of Mulchowk
Patan Durbar Square · Patan Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 47
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-f753b6e3a196 Context / identity checkArt gallery
Bhaktapur · Bkt Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 73
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-09313c5330ff Context / identity checkBahadur Shah Bhawan
Patan Durbar Square · Patan Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 50
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-87a950840466 Context / identity checkBankali Bhajan Ghar
Bankali · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Collapsed
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 84, serial 136
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-c20ad299f639 Context / identity checkBetal Pati
Taumadi · Bkt Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Collapsed
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 63
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-4f39fd0eaf54 Context / identity checkBhandarghar (Gorakhnath Temple complex)
Mrigasthali · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 89
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-3b5b9380bf3b Context / identity checkBhasar Tahabil Office
West of Bagmati · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 110
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-5b7389ce928a Context / identity checkBronze Art Museum Building
Bhaktapur · Bkt Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 72
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-2d6e2fd889c4 Context / identity checkChandreshwor Sattal
Mrigasthali · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 91
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-3599cbf52836 Context / identity checkDaakha Chowk
Hanumandhoka · Hanumandhoka Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 23
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-341f21ddc62c Context / identity checkDasainghar Chowk
Hanumandhoka · Hanumandhoka Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 24
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-cc5993ecb5f0 Context / identity checkDhukutighar
Hanumandhoka · Hanumandhoka Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 27
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-2adb61a04905 Context / identity checkGaddhi Baithak
Hanumandhoka · Hanumandhoka Durbar PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 82, serial 17
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-8a77ce582b42 Context / identity checkGhat Pasal Sattal
Ram Temple Area · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 95
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-bf0d4468f581 Context / identity checkGhyampe Pati
West of Bagmati · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 107
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-3e711eddb8b1 Context / identity checkGuruju Sattal
West of Bagmati · Pashupati PMZ
Reported date: 25 April 2015 AD
Source attribution / cause: Earthquake; no human destroyer
Condition in assessment: Partially Damaged
Site identity, location and individual history still need review. · Research-pass outcome ↗
Source & scope
Nepal Department of Archaeology: damage list, 30 July 2015 ↗
Annex 8, PDF page 83, serial 115
Annex 8, PDF pages 82–84 of the joint monitoring mission report (published 2016): 155 numbered entries plus an unnumbered Mahadev entry. The PDF text layer was checked to correct misaligned scraped rows. Palaces and support structures remain context, not temples. Condition is the July 2015 assessment, not the current condition. Individual identities, duplicate components and locations still require review.
Record: nepal-doa-inventory-42112c9faa94 The full source bodies remain in the research cache. This public catalogue contains an index of factual fields and source locators. It is incomplete, and the source families have different coverage and evidentiary limits.